- Joined
- Nov 19, 2005
- Posts
- 319
You updated your avatar. Diddy Claus.
Neo Gold said:Phillip, please don't forget to add 'Sonic blast'...btw..people, checkout this guys feedback...it just goes to show a high feedback & you still can get your fingers burnt..
Link:-
http://www.neo-geo.com/forums/showthread.php?t=172476
Thankyou.
thchardcore said:
Bulletnyourass said:D-Lite - (Thief/Scammer) Dean has been owing Battlesmurf some items for a mod job for some months now. Numerous people have tried to contact Dean on his behalf but have yet to recieve any responses from him. Once money/items change hands it is the responsibility of the seller/modder to do the work in a timely manner ...OR... at the very least, keep in constant contact with their customer(s). It seems that Dean took on a job during a time that he was too busy to complete it. This will be revised only when Battlesmurf recieves what he has paid for. Read about it here:
http://www.neo-geo.com/forums/showthread.php?t=178982
Doctor Shroom said:You should update that.
thchardcore said:I still don't see SEGASONICFAN on this list...
Bibliophile said:Do you mean SegaFan4Life, instead of SegaSonicFan?
Dude, I am normally right there with you on these things, but I just don't understand this one. I mean, Theif status based on that War Room circle jerk that even Tonk washed his hands of in terms of fault? I don't like the precident of labeling people in this thread based on drama posts with zero hard evidence of intentional wrong doing. The greatness of this thread, and your work, is that it's always so well documented. This isn't, and it bugs me.He means segasonicfan. The problem with this addition is that I don't have an actual sales thread to go by. I am only going by a thread that thc made in regards to a deal the 2 of them had that went pear-shaped. The 2 other people who know about the deal didn't even want to be bothered with it ..so I am listing this one based on the facts that SSF admitted to not wanting to be bothered with responding to the thread. Also he hasn't made a single post since March ..however he last logged in on May 1, 2008. Generally, I dont add these with such little info to go on ... but thc seems to definitely be in the right here. If something changes ... status will be adjusted.
Phillip
SSF, for whatever reason, had not posted in months. He probably wouldn't have posted in this thread if it wasn't for me labeling him.
Thanks for the response Phillip- I can clearly see your point of view now and it does make a lot of sense.
True I suppose, though I'm not sure what kind of person wouldn't post anything if he was labeled as a thief and put on a list of scammers. However, my interest in this matter is pretty mild (I can't say I care too great about people labeling me as a thief when concerning the ambiguity of the situation here- the result of which is obviously faulty for that very reason).
In any case, I see your view and it is understandable: I did not respond to the accusations of thchardcore. And the lack of responding on my part is due to several things:
1) thchardcore offered me a deal to amend the situation and I accepted. Then he rescinded his offer saying that my acceptance was proof of wrongdoing. So he proceeded to start his childish squabbling.
2) thchardcore threatened me constantly with legal action, and as such I do not wish to post things on a public forum as anything I type can/could be used in court proceedings against me.
3) I have had a lot of personal things to deal with that are far more important that thchardcore's accusations and inaccurate perceptions of events. I have not been gaming in quite some time because I have had more pressing matters (both medical and personal).
4) Most arguing on these forums goes on for a very long time with many unassociated parties chiming in to give their viewpoints. Threads become arduously long and slanderous, escalating from childish and callous behavior.
For these reasons I chose to stay away from the forums altogether, especially being that I have not been gaming at all, nor buying or selling and games or modding services. It would be nice to clear my name from this ridiculousness, but I do not have the energy or inclination to proceed in a long drawn-out, name-calling, fact-blurring process. I'm sure Mike has many friends that would chime in to defend his position regardless of association and it would just add to the incredible waste of time these situations become.
to put it concisely, thchardcore made an offer to put this thing behind us, to which I accepted and he later decided it was not good enough. As far as I am concerned that offer remains to put this situation to rest and his childish behavior has led this to the public.
There is never a reason to have more then a 72 hour delay between agreeing on the deal, and sending the items out.
EVER.
I would disagree. 72 hours to ship is not an excessive long time. I can think of countless justifications for exceeding 72 hours.
Keep in mind many of the members of this forum work full-time, and may not be able to get the post office except for only one or two days a week. If you work Monday-Friday and don't get off work till the post office is closed, then you might only have one day a week to make it to the post office (Saturday morning). Thus, a person closing a deal on a Saturday night would not be able to ship it till the next Saturday morning in such an instance. There are many other examples of justifications for exceeding 72 hours.
The important thing is not merely how long it takes to ship, but also COMMUNICATION. If the seller encounters some circumstance that causes an unforeseeable delay in shipping, he should inform the buyer of such. If the buyer can't wait, then the seller should refund the buyer. But most buyers don't mind some delay, so long as the seller stays in touch with them.