- Joined
- Dec 29, 2000
- Posts
- 17,476
I'd argue that it's in the league's best interest financially for the Lakers to be the 'face' of the organization.
It was the Bulls in the 90s because of Mike and especially that second threepeat.
But without Mike or the ability to continue to draw stars to the midwest, the Bulls aren't really a suitable rep for the league.
The Lakers have had the mystique of greatness for a very long time because they're west coast glamour and have a propaganda machine behind them with Hollywood media promoting them. And let's face it, LA is the perfect destination for rich people with huge egos.
It was the Bulls in the 90s because of Mike and especially that second threepeat.
But without Mike or the ability to continue to draw stars to the midwest, the Bulls aren't really a suitable rep for the league.
The Lakers have had the mystique of greatness for a very long time because they're west coast glamour and have a propaganda machine behind them with Hollywood media promoting them. And let's face it, LA is the perfect destination for rich people with huge egos.