- Joined
- Mar 19, 2001
- Posts
- 10,512
Okay, a little backstory, I was SUPPOSED to be moving into a new place tomorrow, taking over a lease for a tenant that's moving out.
Last night, I met with said tenant and the landlord, chatted for awhile, and signed the lease and paid the pro-rated rent for the rest of the month. Everything was going fine and I thought the deal was sealed.
Today, I get a call from the tenant I'm replacing and she said the landlord decided not to rent to me, and she came by and returned the check for the rent, I was to have the deposit tomorrow. According to the landlord, one of the main reasons is that I'm a male, and the two roommates I would have, had I moved in, are female. I had already met and hung out with them, and we got along just fine, they were happy to have me move in with them. Another reason was that she complained I was "unkempt", which is total bullshit as I bathe regularly and am clean-shaven, wear clean clothes, smell nice aside from being a smoker, etc. I have several months rent and the deposit good to go, in my pocket and the landlord still said no.
I don't know a whole lot about this stuff, as in the past I've mostly just slept on couches and paid the other tenants without being on the lease (read: total loser).
The condos are privately owned by a family here in town, they aren't corporate if that makes any difference.
My main questions are:
1) Is that LEGAL? Refusing to let a tenant move in AFTER they have already signed the lease?
2) Is there any kind of illegal discrimination on her part involved in this?
3) Can my signature on that lease come back to bite me in the ass in any way, even though I never moved in?
I know there are a few lawyers that post around here, if you can provide an answer I would be EXTREMELY grateful, wish I had something more for you (like pizza or t-shirts). Thanks!
Last night, I met with said tenant and the landlord, chatted for awhile, and signed the lease and paid the pro-rated rent for the rest of the month. Everything was going fine and I thought the deal was sealed.
Today, I get a call from the tenant I'm replacing and she said the landlord decided not to rent to me, and she came by and returned the check for the rent, I was to have the deposit tomorrow. According to the landlord, one of the main reasons is that I'm a male, and the two roommates I would have, had I moved in, are female. I had already met and hung out with them, and we got along just fine, they were happy to have me move in with them. Another reason was that she complained I was "unkempt", which is total bullshit as I bathe regularly and am clean-shaven, wear clean clothes, smell nice aside from being a smoker, etc. I have several months rent and the deposit good to go, in my pocket and the landlord still said no.
I don't know a whole lot about this stuff, as in the past I've mostly just slept on couches and paid the other tenants without being on the lease (read: total loser).
The condos are privately owned by a family here in town, they aren't corporate if that makes any difference.
My main questions are:
1) Is that LEGAL? Refusing to let a tenant move in AFTER they have already signed the lease?
2) Is there any kind of illegal discrimination on her part involved in this?
3) Can my signature on that lease come back to bite me in the ass in any way, even though I never moved in?
I know there are a few lawyers that post around here, if you can provide an answer I would be EXTREMELY grateful, wish I had something more for you (like pizza or t-shirts). Thanks!