CIA torture report released - rectal feeding is a thing?

evil wasabi

The Jongmaster
20 Year Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2000
Posts
60,434
The report is everything you would expect it to be, and more. So yeah, you were probably right about what you imagined the US torture methods to be. That's the good news. It's also the bad news, I guess.

http://www.businessinsider.com/the-senate-is-about-to-release-the-cia-torture-report-2014-12

The Senate Intelligence Committee released a report on Tuesday that details harsh CIA interrogation techniques that were employed during counterterrorism efforts during the administration of President George W. Bush.

You can read the full report here. This post will be continuously updated with details.

The interrogation techniques described in the report were used under a program authorized by Bush in the wake of the September 11th attacks in 2001.

This program allowed terror suspects to be rendered to sites where they were detained and interrogated.

Full details of the report are below. However, here are some of the more shocking findings:

Among other things, the report found Bush was not briefed during the first four years of the program, while Vice President Dick Cheney was. A CIA email from 2003 stated "the White House is extremely concerned [Secretary of State Colin] Powell would blow his stack if he were to be briefed" about the details of the program.
The report also said the CIA paid two Air Force veterans for $80 million to come up with torture methods. Additionally, it found the agency paid millions of dollars in cash to foreign governments to get them to host black sites where interrogations were held, two of which were not used over political concerns of the host countries.
Torture programs described in the report included "rectal feeding," sleep deprivation, and mock executions. It also said the CIA engaged in efforts to manipulate media coverage of the torture program.
The report also questioned the quality of the information obtained via enhanced interrogation techniques. It noted tortured detainees "provided fabricated information on critical intelligence issues."
Read further details from the report below.

Over 20 People Were 'Wrongly Detained' By The CIA: The CIA "wrongly detained" at least 26 people, according to the report, which said it was actually using a "conservative" calculation of detainees the CIA itself acknowledged should not have been held. The report also accused the CIA of misrepresenting its number of detainees who were wrongly detained.

"While the CIA acknowledged to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) in February 2006 that it had wrongly detained five individuals throughout the course of its detention program, a review of CIA records indicates that at least 21 additional individuals, or a total of 26 of the 119 (22 percent) CIA detainees identified in this Study, did not meet the ... standard for detention," the report said.

Detainees Were Forced To Wear Diapers: The report said the CIA forced detainees to wear diapers and subsequently lied about this practice.

According to the report, the CIA misled the Justice Department about various methods it used to humiliate detainees. These tactics included "cold water immersion," forcing detainees to walk around naked in front of guards, "shackling" detainees' hands above their heads in a stress position for hours at a time, and making them wear diapers in order to make them feel helpless.


"The CIA further represented to the OLC that the use of diapers was ‘for sanitation and hygiene purposes,’ whereas CIA records indicate that in some cases, a central ‘purpose’ of diapers was ‘[t]o cause humiliation’ and ‘to induce a sense of helplessness,’" the report said.

The CIA Misled The Public About The Efficacy Of Its Techniques: The agency claimed the intelligence obtained from enhanced interrogation techniques helped thwart a "Second Wave" series of terrorist attacks after September 11th. However, the Senate report described that claim aas "inaccurate."

"The CIA represented that its enhanced interrogation techniques were effective and necessary to produce critical, otherwise unavailable intelligence, which enabled the CIA to disrupt terrorist plots, capture terrorists, and save lives. Over a period of years, the CIA provided the 'discovery' and/or 'thwarting' of the Second Wave plotting and the 'discovery' of the al-Ghuraba group as evidence for the effectiveness of the CIA's enhanced interrogation techniques. These representations were inaccurate," the report said.

The report also found the interrogation tactics actually led the CIA to receive incorrect information from detainees.

"CIA detainees subjected to the CIA's enhanced interrogation techniques provided significant fabricated information on both the Second Wave plotting and the al-Ghuraba group," the report said.

The Death Of Gul Rahman: The report includes details of the events that led up to the death of "a suspected Islamic extremist" named Gul Rahman at a facility known as "Detention Site Cobalt" in November 2002. According to the report, Rahman was subjected to an interrogation that included “48 hours of sleep deprivation, auditory overload, total darkness, isolation, a cold shower, and rough treatment." The report said officials did not approve of the use of these techniques on Rahman in advance.

Dates in the report were redacted, but sometime the initial interrogation, it said a CIA officer ordered Rahman "be shackled to the wall of his cell in a position that required the detainee to rest on the bare concrete floor."

"Rahman was wearing only a sweatshirt, as [CIA OFFICER 1] had ordered that Rahman's clothing be removed when he had been judged to be uncooperative during an earlier interrogation,” the report said. “The next day, the guards found Gul Rahman's dead body."

Detainees Were Subjected To Mock Executions: The report noted "Detention Site Cobalt" was investigated after Rahman's death. Still, the report said officials were not informed about many of the interrogations techniques being used there — including mock executions.

"Specifically, the interrogation techniques that went unreported in CIA cables included standing sleep deprivation in which a detainee's arms were shackled above his head, nudity, dietary manipulation, exposure to cold temperatures, cold showers, 'rough takedowns,' and, in at least two instances, the use of mock executions," the report said.

CIA Worked To Shape Press Coverage Of The Torture Program: According to the report, the CIA provided unattributed background information to the press as part of a public relations effort in support of the torture program. Specifically, the report noted the CIA director "blessed" the leaking of classified information for the book "The CIA At War" by Ronald Kessler.

"When the journalists to whom the CIA had provided background information published classified information, the CIA did not, as a matter of policy, submit crimes reports," the report said. "For example, as described in internal emails, the CIA's [redacted] never opened an investigation related to Ronald Kessler's book The CIA at War, despite the inclusion of classified information, because 'the book contained no firsttime disclosures,' and because 'OPA provided assistance with the book.'"

The CIA Lied To The Department Of Justice: In addition to misling DOJ officials about the use of diapers at detention facilities, the report found the CIA "gave the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel inaccurate information about how it interrogated Abu Zubaydah and subsequent detainees."

Misrepresentations to the DOJ included the CIA giving inaccurate information about how detainees were waterboarded. The report said the CIA also said medical personnel intervened when detainees who were being sleep deprived "experienced hallucinations." According to the report, this was a lie.

"Multiple CIA detainees subjected to prolonged sleep deprivation experienced hallucinations, and CIA interrogation teams did not always discontinue sleep deprivation after the detainees had experienced hallucinations," the report said.

The report also noted Zubaydah had a gunshot wound when he was taken into custody. While the CIA told DOJ officials his "recovery from his wound would not be impeded by the use of the CIA's enhanced interrogation techniques," the Senate committee subsequently found officials allowed his wound to become infected.

The Interrogation of Muhammad Rahim: Rahim was arrested in June 2007 on suspicion he had direct knowledge of the locations of Al Qaeda leaders Osama bin Laden and/or Ayman al-Zawahiri.

According to the report, Rahim was held for a week before being questioned as the CIA waited for an executive order interpreting the Geneva Conventions in a manner that would allow the use of enhanced interrogation techniques. The following techniques were approved: “sleep deprivation, dietary manipulation, facial grasp, facial slap, abdominal slap, and the attention grab.”

During his interrogation, the report said Rahim was shackled in a standing position, subjected to eight sleep deprivation schedules, and was limited a diet almost entirely composed of water and liquid Ensure meals. In a final round of questioning, Rahim was subjected to a prolonged sleep deprivation session that lasted for a total of 138.5 hours.

The report also noted the interrogation of "Mohammad Rahim resulted in no disseminated intelligence reports."

The CIA Lied To Journalists: The Senate report found CIA officials gave The New York Times information about the interrogation of detainee Abu Zubaydah that directly conflicted the agency's own records.

"David Johnston of the New York Times called the CIA's OPA with a proposed news story about the interrogation of Abu Zubaydah," the report said. "In an email with the subject line, ‘We Can't Let This Go Unanswered,’ the CIA's director of public affairs in OPA, Mark Mansfield, described Johnston's proposed narrative as ‘bullshit’ and biased toward the FBI, adding that ‘we need to push back."

According to the report, on September 10, 2006, an article was published in the Times by Johnston titled, 'At a Secret Interrogation, Dispute Flared Over Tactics.' The report noted Johnston's article included "'sharply contrasting accounts' of the interrogation of Abu Zubaydah." This included what the report described as "the frequent CIA representation that, after the use of ‘tougher tactics,’ Abu Zubaydah 'soon began to provide information on key Al Qaeda operators to help us find and capture those responsible for the 9/11 attacks.'"

"This characterization of Abu Zubaydah's interrogation is incongruent with CIA interrogation records," the report said.

Bush stopped much of the program, which involved terrorism suspects being rendered to facilities where they were detained and interrogated, before he left office in 2009. President Barack Obama then banned so-called "enhanced interrogation techniques" when he took office. Obama has acknowledged some of the tactics used as part of the program were torture.

The Senate Intelligence Committee spent several years compiling this report. Ahead of its release, officials stepped up security at US installations around the world due to concerns the violent and graphic details of the program could lead to violence. Due to these fears, the release of the report is controversial.

Though the White House backed the release of the report, Secretary of State John Kerry apparently expressed some concern about security issues last week. A pair of Republican lawmakers, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Florida) and Sen. Jim Risch (R-Idaho) also issued a joint statement on Monday criticizing the decision to release the report.

"We are concerned that this release could endanger the lives of Americans overseas, jeopardize U.S. relations with foreign partners, potentially incite violence, create political problems for our allies, and be used as a recruitment tool for our enemies," Rubio and Risch said.



Reporting by, Jeremy Bender, Colin Campbell, Pamela Engel, Erin Fuchs, Armin Rosen, and Hunter Walker



Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/the-...-the-cia-torture-report-2014-12#ixzz3LQGUr4fN
 

neo_mao

Been There., Done That., It Was Shit.,
15 Year Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2007
Posts
10,183
2 guys were paid $80 million dollars to come up with ideas like sticking food up someone's butt and making them wear diapers?


I am in the wrong business.
 

jro

Gonna take a lot
20 Year Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2004
Posts
14,429
Cartman was on to something here.

edit: Trey Parker and Matt Stone should be demanding credit for this and/or royalties.
 

dspoonrt

Genam's Azami Sharpener
10 Year Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Posts
1,518
Cartman was on to something here.

edit: Trey Parker and Matt Stone should be demanding credit for this and/or royalties.

First thing I thought of, too. There's always at least some fact in fiction, especially in satire/black comedy like South Park.

Also, if the detainees were forced to wear diapers, who's changing/disposing of these diapers? Just let them shit in a hole. It's way easier and still pretty degrading.
 

NeoSneth

Ned's Ninja Academy Dropout
20 Year Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2000
Posts
11,108
rectal feeding is not uncommon.
just sayin.
 

Pasky

Fug:DDDDD,
Joined
May 5, 2013
Posts
2,844
Always amazed at how the magnifying glass comes over the US torture and interrogation methods when you got other countries like Mexico, Brazil, and lots of Asia feeding people feces with a spoon, shoving bamboo sheets in their finger nails, and shoving coke bottles up someones ass (among other horrible things). I read some article about why coke bottles were used and it was a psychological tactic. Every time that person sees a coke bottle now he'll be reminded it was jammed up his ass. The world is a sick place if you look for it, yet shit like sleep deprivation and humiliation done by the US gets the most scrutiny from hippees.
 

ki_atsushi

So Many Posts
No Time
For Games.
20 Year Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2005
Posts
23,647
Always amazed at how the magnifying glass comes over the US torture and interrogation methods when you got other countries like Mexico, Brazil, and lots of Asia feeding people feces with a spoon, shoving bamboo sheets in their finger nails, and shoving coke bottles up someones ass (among other horrible things). I read some article about why coke bottles were used and it was a psychological tactic. Every time that person sees a coke bottle now he'll be reminded it was jammed up his ass. The world is a sick place if you look for it, yet shit like sleep deprivation and humiliation done by the US gets the most scrutiny from hippees.

These guys are pussies. If they can't take sleep deprivation, wearing a diaper (that nobody outside the compound is even going to see) or having their dicks ridiculed by women (that they don't even know) then they are too weak to live. And waterboarding, big fucking whoop, one guy passed out one time. From his own fear. This should embolden us, not divide us. Our enemies are weak little fucks.

Yep, waterboarding is not real torture. Real torture is permanent damage or disfigurement, like cutting off fingers, toes, or appendages, disemboweling, shoving large frayed wire cables up someone's ass and pulling out their rectum with it (Saddam was famous for this).

My question is: Why bother capturing these fucks if we can't get information out of them the normal way? Just shoot them on the battlefield.
 

StevenK

ng.com SFII tournament winner 2002-2023
10 Year Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Posts
10,162
This is some pretty horrible shit, but what makes it harder to digest is that the various abhorrent anti terrorism methods that have been used post September 11th by western governments have in large part worked.

Arguable of course.
 

Tacitus

Volatile Memory Construct - SN://0467839
Staff member
Joined
Apr 26, 2002
Posts
15,120
Rectal Feeding?

They got their ass eaten?

I know people who pay good money for that.
 

lithy

Most Prominent Member of Chat
20 Year Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2002
Posts
22,054
My question is: Why bother capturing these fucks if we can't get information out of them the normal way? Just shoot them on the battlefield.

Because we were (are?) fighting a supposedly moral war. Spreading freedom and all that jazz.

You can't pick a fight with some brown people, fuck their country back to the stone age, capture people and torture them, and then get pissy when they don't like you after the details become public.

Intelligence from torture has been proven time and time again to be unreliable if not totally useless. Torture is good for being a sick fuck and extracting some form of vengeance, not for intelligence gathering.

Those guys should have been put on trial and locked up if the g-men had any decent case against them. Mostly likely, they didn't, so instead they holed them up at black sites to let some twisted Jimbo get off on shoving things up people's butts.

comm-4a-inessentialhouses.gif
 

hyper

fresh out of fucks
10 Year Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2010
Posts
5,616
no

this shock jock "journalism" is propaganda for the majority voting bloc, uninterested in policy that actually effects the country
 

ki_atsushi

So Many Posts
No Time
For Games.
20 Year Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2005
Posts
23,647
Intelligence from torture has been proven time and time again to be unreliable if not totally useless.

That's what the bleeding hearts want you to think. Actually, the intel we got from those captives led us to Bin Laden, among other things.
 

Mercuttio

Edo Express Delivery Guy
10 Year Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Posts
340
I'm most curious about the quote marks around "rectal feeding." Was that the fun pet name they kicked around the office for whatever it actually is?
 

wataru330

Mr. Wrestling IV
20 Year Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2003
Posts
9,720
Rectal Feeding?

They got their ass eaten?

I know people who pay good money for that.


Yeah, and the crusty gutter punks in HighSchool, used to sneak wine into the Long's Drugs bathroom and do wine enemas.

Only torture there, was on the poor clerk that had to clean up.
 

lithy

Most Prominent Member of Chat
20 Year Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2002
Posts
22,054
Actually, the intel we got from those captives led us to Bin Laden.

Nope. That's what the CIA wants you to think, because they want to keep putting things in people's butts.
 

Rot

Calvin & Hobbes, ,
Joined
Jul 8, 2003
Posts
11,441
Jesus Christ ..this is sad.
Now we know our tax dollars went up someones ass..
 

ki_atsushi

So Many Posts
No Time
For Games.
20 Year Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2005
Posts
23,647
By the way, you know the real reason they picked today to release this "bombshell"?

To take attention off of the Obamacare hearings, which are also today.
 

hyper

fresh out of fucks
10 Year Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2010
Posts
5,616
exactly, among the myriad other insane scandals
 

norton9478

So Many Posts
No Time
For Games.
20 Year Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2003
Posts
34,074
These guys are pussies. If they can't take sleep deprivation, wearing a diaper (that nobody outside the compound is even going to see) or having their dicks ridiculed by women (that they don't even know) then they are too weak to live. And waterboarding, big fucking whoop, one guy passed out one time. From his own fear. This should embolden us, not divide us. Our enemies are weak little fucks.
.

Then there are the deaths. Like a guy shackled in to the floor naked and dies of hypothermia.
 

norton9478

So Many Posts
No Time
For Games.
20 Year Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2003
Posts
34,074
By the way, you know the real reason they picked today to release this "bombshell"?

To take attention off of the Obamacare hearings, which are also today.

Using real news to distract us from kangaroo hearings......

Such a smart idea.
 
Top