Maybe because most mass shooters look like a white dude with a rifle? lol
Not saying it's a great idea but if you thought he was gonna open fire and felt like trying to save lives, I could see that scenario being plausible in someones head.
They have a right to demonstrate, sure. But also, any marginalized person has the legal right to walk by that demonstration and (in many states) carry a weapon by them. Basically, it's completely legal for some idiot to purposely put themselves in danger while purposely carrying lethal weapons like this fucktard did, except this kid isn't even legal! It's just fucking dumb, but dumb isn't illegal sadly.This is unfortunately an issue like allowing the KKK to march in the streets. I don’t condone their actions, I do accept their right to do so.
Oh for sure, I understand that, just saying why someone might have done it. IMO it's less dumb than Rittenhouse being there in the first place lolThe mere presence of a gun, where legally allowed, is not cause to engage in deadly force against the person with a gun.
Obviously the police don’t follow that rule, but that’s the way it is.
Can't argue thatYour right to be a fucktard is constitutionally guaranteed.
All parties involved fucked around and found out on that night. Too bad everyone didn’t take a second to rethink their actions that night.
Man, there's some fucking gymnastics in this thread. If you're defending anything this little fucking chode has done, you're a piece of shit, full stop.
when you arm yourself and wander behind enemy lines
Oh my fucken gourd.
Enemy lines.
el-oh-fucking-el
Definition of analogy | Dictionary.com
Definition of analogy from Dictionary.com, the world’s leading online source for English definitions, pronunciations, word origins, idioms, Word of the Day, and more.www.dictionary.com
So if he had showed up unarmed instead as a 'counter protester', asking the idiots to please, pretty please, kindly not burn things and put out their dumpster fire and was then beaten to shit or killed, that's a preferable outcome to you.
Do I have the purpose of your analogy correct?
I believe in equal force self defense. In short, ideally you never use force in excess of what you're faced with by an attacker.No one deserves to be shot to death. Period.
I believe in equal force self defense. In short, ideally you never use force in excess of what you're faced with by an attacker.
He's a fucking retard. That's all that really needs to be said.
On what fucking planet did you draw this comparison? I don't even know wtf you are saying. Share your drugs please.Almost any woman is now a victim of an attacking man in skate's world.
I believe in equal force self defense. In short, ideally you never use force in excess of what you're faced with by an attacker.
To be fair my stance is what I was trained as a FEMA officer in New Orleans. It may not be as reasonable for all civilians. And it's not my standard for claiming self defense, rather my preferred ethical method of self defense.Talking about the strictness of your standard to be 'allowed' to claim self defense.
lithy, you're an absolute fuckboy. It must suck going through life being an asshole, a chode, and a cunt all in one.