Bush picks Harriet Miers for Supreme Court

[evil wasabi]

IT's a Yogism....

You have to think outside the box in order to Understand what Charlie and I are saying......

This further demonstrates that you are unable to do so.

he's still thinking within the bong. but when it's cashed, he'll see the light, and maybe other things, depending on what he smoked.

 

[Magnaflux]

Smoking drugs makes you smarter?

What have I been doing all this time?!

 

[norton9478]

he's still thinking within the bong. but when it's cashed, he'll see the light, and maybe other things, depending on what he smoked.

Nah I take my comments about thinking outside the box back.

I think He just wantched too much GI JOE Growing up.....

 

[Stinky-Dinkins]

wantched too much GI JOE Growing up.....

I wantched way too much GI JOE.

DOWN WITH AMERICA. FUCKING TEAR IT DOWN! TEAR IT DOWN!

NO BLOOD FOR OIL DUDE!

 

[Magnaflux]

GI JOE was the last great cartoon IMO.

The rest is watered down sissy shit except Ren and Stimpy.

 

[norton9478]

I wantched way too much GI JOE.

DOWN WITH AMERICA. FUCKING TEAR IT DOWN! TEAR IT DOWN!

NO BLOOD FOR OIL DUDE!

No Blood For Oil???

What's that got to do with anything.......

 

[Stinky-Dinkins]

No Blood For Oil???

What's that got to do with anything.......

TEAR IT DOWN! TEAR IT ALL DOWN!

NO FUCKING BLOOD FOR OIL DUDE!

BUSH EQUALS HITLER!

 

[norton9478]

TEAR IT DOWN! TEAR IT ALL DOWN!

NO FUCKING BLOOD FOR OIL DUDE!

BUSH EQUALS HITLER!

Are you calling me a Hippie?

 

[Stinky-Dinkins]

Are you calling me a Hippie?

http://www.neo-geo.com/forums/showpost.php?p=1682122&postcount=182

 

[norton9478]

I fucking hate hippies man........

Especialy when they ask me...

So your name's fish huh????

IS that spelled with an F or a PH???????

Hippies suck...

 

[Stinky-Dinkins]

What kind of name is fish?

 

[norton9478]

What kind of name is fish?

It's a Last Name.....

 

[norton9478]

I also Hate Hippies because they smell like a combination of Weed and B.O.

 

[Stinky-Dinkins]

I'm going to pretend it's your first name.

 

[norton9478]

Back ON topic

But might not his nomination be overruled? I grant it might,
yet this could only be to make place for another nomination by
himself. The person ultimately appointed must be the object of his
preference, though perhaps not in the first degree. It is also not
very probable that his nomination would often be overruled. The
Senate could not be tempted, by the preference they might feel to
another, to reject the one proposed; because they could not assure
themselves, that the person they might wish would be brought forward
by a second or by any subsequent nomination. They could not even be
certain, that a future nomination would present a candidate in any
degree more acceptable to them; and as their dissent might cast a
kind of stigma upon the individual rejected, and might have the
appearance of a reflection upon the judgment of the chief
magistrate, it is not likely that their sanction would often be
refused, where there were not special and strong reasons for the
refusal.
To what purpose then require the co-operation of the Senate? I
answer, that the necessity of their concurrence would have a
powerful, though, in general, a silent operation. It would be an
excellent check upon a spirit of favoritism in the President, and
would tend greatly to prevent the appointment of unfit characters
from State prejudice, from family connection, from personal
attachment, or from a view to popularity. In addition to this, it
would be an efficacious source of stability in the administration.

Alex Hamiliton: From the Federalist papers.