- Joined
- Aug 20, 2000
- Posts
- 60,434
not interested. I don't trust google anymore.
Google just finished their presentation on their forthcoming flavor or linux and it was pretty damned interesting. For those that didn't follow it, here are a few take aways:
- All applications and data will be stored in "the cloud", i.e. at Google.
- The file system is encrypted, auto-updating, and read only, all major facets of the OS will be online through the chrome browser.
- Can't install binaries on the system.
- It will support HTML 5 and thus hardware acceleration, so 3D graphics and games will still be possible despite being an entirely online OS.
- Existing peripherals (usb drives, phones, etc.) can still be used.
- The OS is smart enough to know where to open a file, i.e. an xls will open up in Excel on Microsoft Office Online, PDF's open in Google Docs, etc.
- It will not support hard drives of any kind, all will be SSD's.
- Designed to run on Netbooks and push a new type of computing.
- You can already compile this yourself if you want, but you'll need to mod a netbook to get it to run perfectly as they're restricting hardware to a specific set of components to make sure everything runs perfectly ala Mac's and OSX hardware optimization.
- It's strictly going to be a companion device, not a primary computer.
Seems kind of interesting, I'm personally curious if this will eventually be able to tap into cloud compute services well, so that you could actually do serious, hd video editing on a netbook and only pay for the instances or compute cycles you use.
The next question is whether plugins are going to work properly ala Silverlight. Flash works though.
I'm intrigued, how about you guys?
Ha.. that was my initial response.
What do you specifically work with?
If you are using your computer for simply internet browsing then I see no issue with this OS. IT's an internet machine...as anything else its kind of pointless.
not interested. I don't trust google anymore.
Since all you do is log in with your Google ID from the main screen, the only thing I can really see this being useful for is a public terminal at say a library or maybe like an airport or something.
Outside of that, not sure why anyone that owns a computer would want to stream apps and data from the internet, which is almost guaranteed to be slower and more error prone than reading from an HD.
Well for most webapps it's actually running them natively via Gears.
According to Google, the advantage is that your data is available anywhere...so you don't have to be on your computer running Chrome OS to access all of your documents and data. If you were to lose your computer, you could remotely wipe it and have an exact replica on whatever machine you're currently using.
Now, this still requires enormous trust in Google which you may or may not have.
external HDDs say hi
I'm totally against this....but if anyone wants to mess around with it, here ya go.
http://www.ilovetorrents.com/details.php?id=146387
32gb SD card says hello.
What the fuck kind of powerpoints presentations and word documents do you keep that it takes up over 10 gigs?
Even if you can access the apps without internet access your FILES are still unavailable which makes the whole idea of this being used on personal devices kind of silly.
@Nes - I think it's less about slimming down and more about changing the way we're used to using computers. I kind of agree with them on that. The OS boots in 7 seconds for gods sake and put's you right into a browser which is what I'm using 99% of the time.