Patrick agreed with me the most (10), Warren second (9), and Bloomberg/Sanders/Steyer tied for third (8). Gabbard came in last at 6. I was kind of surprised that none of the Democrats agreed with some of my answers (okay, my stance on marijuana versus there's wasn't a surprise to me), I guess I'm not as liberal as I thought.
Anyone in the senate who exonerates Trump isn't just responsible for covering up this transgression, they are responsible for ALL FUTURE TRANSGRESSIONS>
Y no Bloomberg?
I don't think he can/would win in a general election.
The affiliation switching reads as opportunistic rather than independent.
He has similar "baggage" to Trump.
Taken together, Ds throwing their support behind him in the general will look hypocritical, which I think will discourage turnout in places where he needs it. I don't see Wisconsin showing up for Mike Bloomberg.
Could you say the same about rational democrats who have been rejecting Sanders up to this point? They have basically shit on him for years. Can’t back him after that. Not now at least.
I'm interested to see what happens in the south and major metro areas.
Clinton swept these areas in the last primary.
Some polling is showing Bloomberg in first and second place.
He wasn't even registering a week or two ago so that's kinda nuts.
Biden is almost falling off the rolls at the moment of truth after polling in first for almost a year.
The media still appears to be trying to steer everybody away from Sanders.
Anyone in the senate who exonerates Trump isn't just responsible for covering up this transgression, they are responsible for ALL FUTURE TRANSGRESSIONS>